Bryan
Bryan v. Apple Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, et al., Case No. 22-cv-00845-HSG
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
v. DISMISS
APPLE INC., Re: Dkt. No. 27, 38 Defendant.
12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Apple Inc.’s motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 27. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Christopher Bryan and Heriberto Valiente bring this putative nationwide class action against Defendant, alleging that Apple’s iPad Mini 6 is defective. See Dkt. No. 20 (“FAC”). Specifically, Plaintiffs contend that the iPad’s liquid crystal display (“LCD”) screens are prone to image distortions called “jelly scrolling,” which “bends, warps, blurs and obscures text and images…