Sjodin
Sjodin v. State of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 KIRK ARDELL SJODIN, Case No. 23-cv-00195-JD Plaintiff, y. ORDER RE DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 6, 8, 9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 11 Plaintiff, a state prisoner acting pro se, filed a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. || Plaintiff was sent a notice that he had not paid the filing fee or submitted a complete application 14 || for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). He was provided twenty-eight days to correct || these deficiencies. More than twenty-eight days has passed, and plaintiff has not paid the fee or a || filed a complete application to proceed IFP. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 17 || Plaintiffs motions (Dkt. Nos. 6, 8 and 9) are DENIED. Plaintiff is also advised that, to recover damages for an allegedly unconstitutional conviction or imprisonment, he must demonstrate that the conviction or sentence has been reversed, expunged or declared invalid. …