Heard

Heard v. Jackson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20233:21-cv-09472California558 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHARLES HEARD, Case No. 21-cv-09472-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO

v. AMEND

DAMON JACKSON, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 55 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff initially sued Sergeant Damon Jackson and the City and County of San Francisco (“the City”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Dkt. No. 1.) After Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”). (Dkt. No. 26.) After Defendants again moved to dismiss the FAC, (Dkt. No. 27), the Court allowed a claim against the City to proceed, but granted Sergeant Jackson’s motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 27 at 1.) Specifically, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s claim Jackson withheld exculpatory evidence because “drawing all reasonable inferences in Plaintiff’s favor, the amended complaint can only support an inference that Jackson shared the exculpatory evidence with District Attorney investigators.” (Id. at 5.) The Court dismissed the claims against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.