Barrett
Barrett v. Brumfield
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSEPH ANTHONY BARRETT, Case No. 21-cv-06802-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
v. JUDGMENT; REFERRING CASE TO
PRO SE PRISONER MEDIATION
BRUMFIELD, et al., PROGRAM; STAYING ACTION;
DIRECTIONS TO CLERK
Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 15
13 Plaintiff, an inmate at San Quentin State Prison, has filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that SQSP correctional officials McLean, Faaita, Del Rosario, Ramirez, Robinson and Adamik used, or authorized the use of, excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment when they extracted Plaintiff from his cell on December 23, 2018. See generally Dkt. Nos. 1, 3. Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 15. Plaintiff has filed an opposition, Dkt. No. 22, and Defendants have filed a reply, Dkt. No. 23. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ summary judgment motion. …