Barrett

Barrett v. Brumfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20234:21-cv-06802California7,676 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSEPH ANTHONY BARRETT, Case No. 21-cv-06802-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT; REFERRING CASE TO

PRO SE PRISONER MEDIATION

BRUMFIELD, et al., PROGRAM; STAYING ACTION;

DIRECTIONS TO CLERK

Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 15

13 Plaintiff, an inmate at San Quentin State Prison, has filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that SQSP correctional officials McLean, Faaita, Del Rosario, Ramirez, Robinson and Adamik used, or authorized the use of, excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment when they extracted Plaintiff from his cell on December 23, 2018. See generally Dkt. Nos. 1, 3. Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 15. Plaintiff has filed an opposition, Dkt. No. 22, and Defendants have filed a reply, Dkt. No. 23. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ summary judgment motion. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.