In re Raina M. Cardoni

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20233:22-cv-01616California1,057 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE RAINA M. CARDONI, Case No. 3:22-cv-01616-JD

Debtor.

ORDER RE BANKRUPTCY APPEAL

RUBY CREEK RANCH, LLC

10 Appellant, 11 v.

RAINA M. CARDONI,

13 Appellee.

The parties to this bankruptcy appeal were directed to file a joint statement by February 3, 2023, advising the Court of whether the appeal should be dismissed as moot in light of a potential settlement with respect to the property at issue. Dkt. No. 28. The parties filed a statement, Dkt. No. 29, in which they asked that the appeal not be dismissed until the settlement was final, and stated that they would “inform the court upon the completion of the settlement or by March 1, 2023, whichever is earlier.” Dkt. No. 29 at 2. They did not discuss why the appeal presented a live, justiciable controversy in light of the proposed settlement or related developments. The parties’ self-imposed March 1 deadline to provide a further status report came and went without any updates. “[I]t is familiar law that a federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.