Petitt
Petitt v. Exigency Healthcare Services, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ANIETTA C. PETITT, Case No. 21-cv-07639-VKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT
v. AND AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES
AND COSTS
EXIGENCY HEALTHCARE SERVICES, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 27 12 Defendants.
13 Plaintiff Anietta Petitt sued defendants Exigency Healthcare Services, LLC (“Exigency”), Felixberto Matamis, and Karen Panilio. Dkt. No. 1. Defendants employed Ms. Petitt and others as caregivers for the elderly. Id. ¶ 20. In this action, Ms. Petitt asserts one claim for violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, id. ¶¶ 32-40, and seven claims for violations of the California Labor Code, id. ¶¶ 41-91. The complaint also includes a representative claim for payment of civil penalties under the California Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”), Cal. Labor Code § 2698 et seq. Id. ¶¶ 92-105. Ms. Petitt and defendants have settled all claims, and seek the Court’s approval of the…