Hayden

Hayden v. Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20233:20-cv-00367California807 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL HAYDEN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-00367-VC Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE OUTSTANDING

Vv. MOTIONS TO SEAL PORTOLA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 243 et al., Defendants.

The following chart adjudicates the pending motions to seal in this case. A party seeking to seal information in a dispositive motion must show a “compelling reason” to justify its request. Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178-79 (9th Cir. 2006). Jackson Square in particular has failed to explain why there are “compelling reasons” to seal its internal discussions related to the stocks in this case. Jackson Square’s requests to seal that information are denied. The parties should file the unredacted documents on the docket within 7 days of this order.!

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 6, 2023 Lo.

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge

' The Joint Statement Summarizing Outstanding Motions to Seal refers to a category of documents “for which the designating parties have not objected to filing on the public docket.” If the parties have not filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.