Ou-Young
Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 KUANG-BAO PAUL OU-YOUNG, Case No. 5:22-cv-05066 EJD
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTIONS TO VACATE
v.
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 16, 17 Defendants.
Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young (“Plaintiff”) moved to vacate the Court’s Order Dismissing Action for Lack of Prosecution (ECF No. 13). ECF Nos. 16, 17. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND On December 20, 2013, Judge Chen issued an order declaring Plaintiff to be a vexatious litigant and directing pre-filing screening of any complaint filed by Plaintiff involving certain statutes and parties. See Ou-Young v. Roberts (“First Screening Order”), Case No. 13-cv-04442, ECF 40 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 2013). Judge Chen’s Order required that: Plaintiff must obtain leave of court before filing any further…