Peasley

Peasley v. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20234:15-cv-01769California1,364 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID SCOTT PEASLEY, Case No. 15-cv-01769-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT; GRANTING

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

M. SPEARMAN, et al., JUDMGENT Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 389, 418

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se. He filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Following remand by the Court of Appeals and reassignment of this case to the undersigned, one claim remains. The remaining claim is “Count 6” in which he alleges that Defendants Gibson, Lopez, and Orozco, officials at the California Training Facility (“CTF”), failed to provide him access to needed medical care on one occasion in September 2013. These Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff filed an opposition, and Defendants filed a reply brief. For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED. The other pending…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.