Pumphrey

Pumphrey v. Battles

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20233:21-cv-09005California984 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 TYRONE PUMPHREY, Case No. 21-cv-09005-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATION

v. FOR INTERLOCUTORY REVIEW

BRANDON BATTLES, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 54 Defendants.

11 This civil rights case (“Pumphrey II”) arises from Defendants’ detention of Plaintiff at Martinez Jail on June 8, 2019.1 (See Dkt. No. 3.) Defendants request the Court certify two orders for interlocutory review. First, Defendants seek to appeal the Court’s order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss the first amended complaint (“FAC”). Second, Defendants seek review of the Court’s order denying Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. After carefully considering the arguments and briefing submitted, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and DENIES Defendants’ motion. DISCUSSION Generally, the United States Courts of Appeals have jurisdiction over appeals from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.