Misson

Misson v. Robles

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20233:22-cv-01744California499 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HAKAM MISSON, et al., Case No. 22-cv-01744-AGT

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION TO REMAND AND

v. DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT

PREJUDICE TO REFILING IN STATE

LUIS FLORES ROBLES, et al., COURT Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

Plaintiffs initiated this action in federal court based on federal question jurisdiction. Their complaint asserted two federal claims—misappropriation under the DTSA, and violation of RICO—and numerous state law claims arising from defendants’ alleged “scheme to defraud and extort monies from Plaintiffs.” The Court previously granted defendants’ motion to dismiss both federal claims under Rule 12(b)(6), and granted plaintiffs leave to amend as follows:

To the extent plaintiffs wish to pursue this action in federal court, they may file an amended complaint by January 28, 2023, to cure the identified defects in the federal claims. Plaintiffs are advised that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.