Haeck

Haeck v. 3M Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20233:23-cv-00045California3,832 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GARY HAECK, et al., Case No. 23-cv-00045-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION TO REMAND AND

GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR

3M COMPANY, et al., FEES AND COSTS Defendants. Docket Nos. 25,

12 Plaintiffs are Gary and Elizabeth Haeck. Mr. Haeck is suffering from malignant pleural mesothelioma after being exposed to asbestos for decades. Plaintiffs filed suit in state court against more than thirty defendants, including 3M Company (“3M”), alleging strict products liability, negligence, fraud, and loss of consortium. After Plaintiffs resolved their claims against all Defendants except 3M and one additional company, 3M removed this case to federal district court based on diversity jurisdiction. Currently pending before the Court are Plaintiffs’ motion to remand the case back to state court and motion for fees and costs. The Court previously found the motions suitable for resolution on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.