Floyd

Floyd v. Santa Clara Department of Correction

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20233:22-cv-00750California2,301 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 MICHAEL DEVIN FLOYD, Case No. 22-cv-00750-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v.

LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED

COMPLAINT AND GRANTING

SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT OF LEAVE TO FILE FURTHER CORRECTION, et al., REVISED AMENDED COMPLAINT 9 Defendants. 10 Plaintiff Michael Devin Floyd (“Floyd”), a pro se complainant who alleges that his 11 rights were violated while he was detained after his August 2021 arrest, seeks leave to file 12 a third amended complaint alleging state-law claims and adding twenty-four new 13 individual defendants. See Mot. (dkt. 71). Defendants Santa Clara Department of 14 Correction, Santa Clara County, the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office, and the Elmwood 15 Correctional Facility (together, “Santa Clara”), oppose Floyd’s motion. See Opp’n (dkt. 16 72). Floyd attached a proposed third amended complaint to his motion, see dkt. 71-2, and a 17 revised proposed third amended complaint to his reply. See Revised Proposed Third Am. 18 Compl. (dkt. 73-1). 19 Because Floyd unduly delayed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.