Ojeda

Ojeda v. Sandoval

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20233:21-cv-07479California3,370 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MANUEL OJEDA, Case No. 21-cv-07479-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO AMEND; AND SERVING

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

C. SANDOVAL, et al., Docket No. 10 Defendants.

12 13 Manuel Ojeda, a prisoner at High Desert State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaining of an incident that occurred at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”), where he previously was incarcerated. See Docket No. 1 (“Complaint”). The Court screened the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A and dismissed it with leave to amend. See Docket No. 9 (“Screening Order”). Mr. Ojeda moved for leave to amend and attached his First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) to that motion. Docket No. 10. Mr. Ojeda’s motion is GRANTED, although it was unnecessary because the Court already gave Mr. Ojeda leave to amend in the Screening Order. The FAC is now before the Court for review. For the reasons stated below,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.