Cramer

Cramer v. Smith

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20233:18-cv-01700California501 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES A. CRAMER, Case No. 18-cv-01700-VC

Plaintiff,

ORDER REOPENING CASE;

v. VACATING ORDER GRANTING

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; SETTING

CHERYL A. GALBRAITH, et al., BRIEFING SCHEDULE Defendants.

James A. Cramer filed this complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against employees of the California Department of Corrections and former employees of Pelican Bay State Prison, where Cramer was previously incarcerated. The court dismissed all claims in the complaint other than a due process claim for damages arising from an incident in 1994 when a false notation was placed in Cramer’s Central File. In September 2020, the court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. In the order granting summary judgment, the court identified Appeal Nos. 96-03332, 15-01055, and 15-02091 as relevant to this action, but noted that Cramer only argued that he exhausted his administrative remedies as to Appeal No. 96- 03332. The Court concluded that Cramer had not exhausted his administrative remedies as to Appeal No. 96-03332 because he did not meet his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.