Saidwal

Saidwal v. Flagship

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20234:19-cv-08211California334 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BIBI NOHIA SAIDWAL, Case No. 19-cv-08211-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING JOINT STATUS

v. REPORTS

FLAGSHIP, Re: Dkt. Nos. 74, 75 Defendant.

12 The Court has received and considered the parties’ status reports regarding arbitration. Although this matter remains stayed pending a final ruling from the Arbitrator, the Court issues this Order to respond to a request Plaintiff makes in her status report to proceed with a portion of a claim the arbitrator referenced as outside the scope of the DRA. Plaintiff attaches the Arbitrator’s ruling on arbitrability with her report. In that ruling, the Arbitrator referred to arguments raised by Plaintiff that Defendant may have violated 18 U.S.C. section 1001. (Plaintiff’s Status, Arbitrator’s Ruling at ECF p. 4; Plaintiff’s Status at ECF p. 2.) The Arbitrator stated such a claim did not appear in the complaint, could not appear in the complaint, and was not within the scope of the 21…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.