Tabron

Tabron v. Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20233:21-cv-04517California509 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSEPH DANIEL TABRON, Case No. 21-cv-04517-EMC

Petitioner,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. EXTENSION OF TIME

RAYMOND MADDEN, Docket No. 32 Respondent.

12 13 The Court screened Petitioner’s habeas petition and ordered Respondent to file an answer. Docket No. 9. After an extension of time, Respondent did so. Docket Nos. 20-21. Petitioner subsequently was granted multiple extensions of time to file a traverse. Petitioner’s extension motions mentioned that Petitioner is being held in jail in Alameda County “for resentencing,” and that Petitioner is pursuing an “1170.95 petition.” Docket Nos. 29, 30. Because it appeared that Petitioner had proceedings pending in state court which may result in his conviction being vacated, the Court issued an order for Petitioner to show cause why this action is not Younger-barred. Docket No. 31. On March 6, 2023, Petitioner filed a motion for an extension of time to file his response…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.