Dilnessa

Dilnessa v. Social Security Administration

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20234:23-cv-01013California862 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

INTRODUCTION

13 Plaintiff, an inmate at Napa State Hospital, filed this pro se civil rights complaint under 42 14 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Social Security Administration, the Butte County Sheriff’s Department, 15 and Napa State Hospital. He is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. 16 For the reasons discussed below, the case is DISMISSED.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

18 Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek 19 redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 20 1915A(a). In its review the court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims 21 which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek 22 monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. at 1915A(b)(1),(2). Pro se 23 pleadings must be liberally construed. Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep't, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th 24 Cir. 1990). 25 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) requires only "a short and plain statement of the 26 claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." "Specific facts are not necessary; the 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.