Baptiste

Baptiste v. Apple Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20234:22-cv-02888California2,035 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LUCILA BAPTISTE, et al., Case No. 22-cv-02888-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 24 APPLE INC., Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 24 (“Mot.”). The Court found this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and took the motion under submission. See Dkt. No. 31; Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The Court now GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs bring a proposed class action against Apple, alleging that it unlawfully retained personally identifiable information (“PII”) collected in connection with video streaming rentals on iTunes. See Dkt. No. 16 ¶ 1 (“First Amended Complaint” or “FAC”). This information includes names, addresses, credit card information, and rental history. Id. Plaintiffs allege that years after renting videos on iTunes, their account histories still displayed the video title, purchase date, and price. Id. ¶¶ 10–20. Plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.