Dominguez

Dominguez v. Burke

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20233:20-cv-09416California2,120 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOE VALDEZ DOMINGUEZ, Case No. 20-cv-09416-EMC

Plaintiff, ORDER (1) OF SERVICE; (2)

DENYING RECONSIDERATION

v. MOTION; AND (3) GRANTING

EXTENSION MOTION NUNC PRO

CHRISTOPHER D. BURKE, et al., TUNC Defendants. Docket Nos. 19,

12 13 I. BACKGROUND On or after December 15, 2020, Joe Valdez Dominguez, an inmate at Salinas Valley State Prison in Soledad, California (“SVSP”), filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Docket No. 1 (“Complaint”) at 14 (dating the Complaint December 15, 2020). The Court reviewed Mr. Dominguez’s Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915 and 1915A, and noted that Mr. Dominguez had failed to identify specific actions each Defendant had taken which harmed Mr. Dominguez. See Docket No. 9. The Court dismissed the Complaint with leave to amend. See id. Mr. Dominguez subsequently filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.