Crowder

Crowder v. LinkedIn Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20234:22-cv-00237California5,166 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TODD CROWDER, et al., Case No. 22-cv-00237-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS AND MOTION TO STAY

v. DISCOVERY

LINKEDIN CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. Nos. 27, 51 Defendant.

12 Before the Court are Defendant’s motion to dismiss and motion to stay discovery. Dkt. Nos. 27, 51. The Court held a hearing on the motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 42. The Court finds the motion to stay discovery appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The Court GRANTS the motions. I. BACKGROUND This is an antitrust proposed class action against LinkedIn, an online social network that focuses on professional connections. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 1, 51. Plaintiffs subscribe to LinkedIn Premium Career, which provides paying users with additional features. Id. ¶¶ 42–44, 47. Plaintiffs assert that LinkedIn has a monopoly in the professional social…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.