Garcia

Garcia v. Gundogdu

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20233:22-cv-00134California707 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ORLANDO GARCIA, Case No. 22-cv-00134-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE MOTION FOR DEFAULT

v. JUDGMENT

TONY GUNDOGDU, et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff Orlando Garcia brought this case against defendants Tony Gundogdu and Aynur Gundogdu, alleging claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (ADA), and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53 (Unruh Act). Dkt. No. 1. Defendants have not appeared in the case, and at Garcia’s request, the Clerk of Court has entered defendants’ defaults. Dkt. Nos. 14 (Aynur Gundogdu), 16 (Tony Gundogdu). Garcia has moved for default judgment. Dkt. No. 22. The Court has received a report and recommendation by a magistrate judge in favor of granting default judgment with a reduced award of attorneys’ fees. Dkt. No. 27. The recommendation is declined, and the request for a default judgment is denied without prejudice to renewal, as warranted. As…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.