NAW TVILY LL INA OS EO LAVIN Pik AY T TENA Ns bai ow i VI a

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2873

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -121)

On December 7, 2018, the Panel transferred 75 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 357 F.Supp.3d 1391 (J.P.M.L. 2018). Since that time, 312 additional action(s) have been transferred to the District of South Carolina. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Richard M. Gergel. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the District of South Carolina and assigned to Judge Gergel. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of South Carolina for the reasons stated in the order of December 7, 2018, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Richard M. Gergel. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7—day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

—_ FOR THE PANEL: ee Dhl. poBA Mar 13, 2023 CMTE SAEs John W. Nichols MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Clerk of the Panel

GSE DISTR. A TRUE COPY

S, ATTEST: ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK

vn oN SG S eS cod a ial] RP ge ls BY: adlie. a Shea a ELD VOR □□

IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM−FORMING FOAMS

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2873

SCHEDULE CTO−121 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN

East Bay Municipal Utility District v. 3M COMPANY f/k/a

CAN 3 23−00738

MINNESOTA MINING et al

NEW JERSEY

NJ 2 23−01097 BRANCHVILLE BOROUGH v. 3M COMPANY et al

NEW YORK SOUTHERN

NYS 1 23−01625 Cotcher et al v. 3M Company et al NYS 1 23−01642 Howard et al v. 3M Company et al