Petitt

Petitt v. Exigency Healthcare Services, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20235:21-cv-07639California765 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ANIETTA C. PETITT, Case No. 21-cv-07639-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

SEAL

EXIGENCY HEALTHCARE SERVICES, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 35 12 Defendants.

13 In connection with plaintiff Anietta C. Petitt’s unopposed motion seeking approval of the parties’ settlement agreement, defendants filed several pages of financial documents conditionally under seal, accompanied by an administrative motion to consider whether the material should be sealed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5. The documents are comprised of 135 pages of financial material, including tax returns, bank statements, and loan information, produced in discovery in support of defendants’ assertion that “a large settlement sum could not be paid.” Dkt. No. 35-1 ¶ 4. The parties stipulated to filing these sensitive financial documents conditionally under seal, and defendants request that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.