Andruhovics

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MAKSIMS ANDRUHOVICS, Case No. 22-cv-01178-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING AND DENYING

MOTIONS TO SEAL

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 9, 31, 33, 40, 43 SAN FRANCISCO SHERIFF'S OFFICE, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Before the court are several administrative motions to file documents under seal. Dkt. Nos. 9, 31, 33, 40, 43. The Court DENIES the motion at Dkt. No. 33 and GRANTS the remaining motions. I. LEGAL STANDARD Courts generally apply a “compelling reasons” standard when considering motions to seal documents. Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006)). “This standard derives from the common law right ‘to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Id. (quoting Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178). “[A] strong presumption in favor of access is the starting point.” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178 (quotations…