Shankar

Shankar v. Jaddou

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20234:22-cv-04040California1,384 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHETHAN JAYARAM SHANKAR, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04040-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

STAY

v. Re: Dkt. No. 18 UR M. JADDOU, et al., Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court is a motion to stay filed by Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”), and Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of the United States Department of State (“DOS”). Dkt. No. 18. Defendants seek to stay this action pending resolution of the appeal before the Ninth Circuit in Babaria v. Blinken, Case No. 22-16700. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Chethan Jayaram Shankar and Ramya Gundmi filed this action to challenge the process by which USCIS and DOS adjudicate I-485 applications for lawful permanent residency status. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.