Gamevice, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GAMEVICE, INC.,

Case No. 18-cv-01942-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR NINTENDO CO., LTD., et al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 Defendants.

15 I. INTRODUCTION Following briefing by both parties in this patent infringement action, an order issued construing ten claims pursuant to Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 52 F.3d 967 (Fed. Cir. 1995). See Dkt. 241. Because Defendant Nintendo Co., Ltd. (“Nintendo”), had also filed a motion for summary judgment that turned on the construction of three of these terms, the order instructed the parties to file “supplemental briefing as to the disposition of the motion based on the adopted constructions.” Id. at 18. This briefing having now been submitted, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. All of the asserted claims that incorporate the term “computing device” are not entitled to an earlier…