Rummell

Rummell v. Lindsey CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 20, 2024D083422California5,749 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dato, J.

Filed 6/20/24 Rummell v. Lindsey CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT RUMMELL et al., D083422

Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v. (Super. Ct. No. CIVSB2200440)

WILLIAM RAY LINDSEY et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, Michael A. Sachs, Judge. Affirmed. Markun Zusman & Compton, Edward S. Zusman, Kevin K. Eng and Tadeusz McMahon, for Defendants and Appellants. Reif Law Group, Brandon S. Reif and Marc S. Ehrlich, for Plaintiffs and Respondents. In this appeal involving a lawsuit brought by a couple against their former financial advisor, his associates, and related business entities, we affirm the trial court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.