Akers

Akers v. Chen

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20235:22-cv-05555California2,302 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS,

Case No. 22-cv-05555 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY v. PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS SHOULD NOT

BE REVOKED PURSUANT TO §

E. CHEN, et al., 1915(G)

Defendants.

17 18 Plaintiff, a convicted and sentenced federal prisoner currently confined at the USP Marion in Illinois, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against a state court judge and under Bivens1 against a district court judge and several federal employees. Dkt. No. 1 at 1, 4. Plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. Dkt. No. 9. The matter was reassigned to this Court on November 15, 2022. Dkt. Nos. 9, 10. For the reasons discussed below, the Court has reason to believe that Plaintiff’s IFP 26 1 Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.