Cupp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD CUPP, Case No. 20-cv-03456-PJH Plaintiff,

v. FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER

ANDREW SMITH, Defendant.

13 Pursuant to Rule 16(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this final pretrial order is hereby entered and shall control the course of the trial unless modified by a subsequent order. I. Motions in Limine A. Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 1 Plaintiff’s first motion in limine to exclude any visual depictions of the Arlington Avenue property other than the photographs defendant produced in discovery is DENIED. However, both parties represented that they did not intend to present photos besides those taken on February 15, 2019, so the motion is moot. Only the photos of the property taken on February 15, 2019, are admissible. B. Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 2 Plaintiff’s second motion in limine to exclude any evidence or testimony of the condition of the Arlington Avenue property…