Hyams

Hyams v. CVS Health Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20234:18-cv-06278California980 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RYAN HYAMS, et al., Case No. 18-cv-06278-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

v. SEAL

CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 187 Defendants.

12 Before the court is Defendants’ renewed administrative motion to file documents under seal. Dkt. No 187. The Court previously denied Defendants’ motions to seal, then stayed the public filing of the documents and directed the parties to file renewed motions that comply with the Civil Local Rules. See Dkt. No. 168. The Court now GRANTS the motion. I. LEGAL STANDARD Courts generally apply a “compelling reasons” standard when considering motions to seal documents. Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006)). “This standard derives from the common law right ‘to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records 22…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.