Schultz

Schultz v. The Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation

Bad Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20233:20-cv-04058California4,686 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRENDAN SCHULTZ, Case No. 20-cv-04058-MMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS

THE HARRY S. TRUMAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION, Re: Dkt. No. 58 11 Defendant. 12 Before the Court is defendant Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation’s (“Foundation”) “Motion,” filed January 9, 2023, “to Dismiss Fourth Amended Complaint” (“FAC”). On January 23, 2023, plaintiff Brendan Schultz (“Schultz”) filed his “Response to Defendant’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Fourth Amended Complaint,” to which the Foundation has replied. Having read and considered the parties’ respective written submissions, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND2 The Foundation is a federal agency that administers the Harry S. Truman Scholarship (“Scholarship”) program. (See FAC ¶ 5.) Schultz, as a third-year undergraduate student, sought and received a nomination from his college to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.