T.T.
T.T. v. Supercell, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 T.T., Case No. 22-cv-03196-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
v. DISMISS
SUPERCELL, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 27 Defendant.
12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Supercell, Inc’s motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 27. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND In this putative class action, T.T., a minor, alleges that Defendant has engaged in deceptive and misleading marketing for in-game items and in-game currency for its video games Clash of Clans, Clash Royale, and Brawl Stars. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”) at ¶ 2. Although the games are free to play, Plaintiff alleges that they “are monetized through a system where players can obtain new…