Mewawalla

Mewawalla v. Middleman

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20233:21-cv-09700California848 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAHUL MEWAWALLA, Case No. 21-cv-09700-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER COMPELLING PLAINTIFF’S

v. PRODUCTION OF COMMON

INTEREST AGREEMENT

STANLEY C. MIDDLEMAN, et al., Docket No. 64 Defendants.

12 13 Parties dispute whether Plaintiff Rahul Mewawalla (“Plaintiff”) is obligated to produce a written “common interest agreement” between himself and Timothy Beard to Defendants Stanley Middleman, Michael Middleman, Gregory Middleman, Freedom Mortgage Corporation, and Xpanse, LLC (“Defendants”). Docket No. 62 (“Disc. Letter”). In compliance with the Court’s order, Plaintiff has filed the Common Interest Agreement provisionally under seal for the Court’s in camera evaluation. Docket No. 64. The Court has reviewed the Common Interest Agreement in camera. It generally recites Plaintiff’s and Mr. Beard’s invocation of common legal interests and factual issues, sets forth general terms of sharing information and waiving any conflict of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.