Shared Partnership v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20233:22-cv-02366California2,311 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 SHARED PARTNERSHIP, Case No. 22-cv-02366-RS (RMI)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTES

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 47, 49 META PLATFORMS, INC., Defendant.

13 Now pending before the court are a pair of discovery dispute letter briefs (dkts. 47, 49) that, generally speaking, represent Plaintiff’s request to compel the production of certain discovery. It appears that the two letters are substantially the same, with the exception that the first letter appears to have been rushed to court before Defendant could articulate its position as to one of the issues raised by Plaintiff (see dkt. 47 at 3-4; see also dkt. 49 at 1, 4-5). Defendant submits that Plaintiff has involved the court prematurely, that the dispute is not quite ripe for a motion to compel, and that the parties should continue to engage one another in the discovery process. See Ltr. Br. (dkt. 49) at 2. For the reasons stated below, the court wholeheartedly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.