Rana

Alert Enterprise, Inc. v. Rana

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20233:22-cv-06646California4,106 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ALERT ENTERPRISE, INC., Case No. 22-cv-06646-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

v. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

IMRAN RANA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 39 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Alert Enterprise, Inc. brings trade secret claims against Defendants Imran Rana and SoloInsight, Inc. (Dkt. No. 23.) Alert and Mr. Rana stipulated to stay the claims against Mr. Rana pending arbitration. (Dkt. No. 34.) SoloInsight now moves to dismiss Alert’s three remaining claims on two grounds: (1) Alert fails to state a claim against SoloInsight and (2) the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“CUTSA”) supersedes two of Alert’s claims. (Dkt. No. 39.) Having reviewed the parties’ submissions, and having had the benefit of oral argument on March 9, 2023, the Court GRANTS SoloInsight’s motion to dismiss all three claims. BACKGROUND A. Complaint Allegations Alert is an “industry leader in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.