Migues

Migues v. State Farm Insurance Companies Fire Claims

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20233:23-cv-00027California1,326 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DUSTIN MIGUES,

Case No. 23-cv-00027-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

STATE FARM INSURANCE

COMPANIES FIRE CLAIMS, Defendant.

15 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the motion of defendant State Farm General Insurance Company (erroneously named as “State Farm Insurance Companies Fire Claims”) to dismiss the complaint brought by pro se plaintiff Dustin Migues is suitable for disposition without oral argument and the hearing set for March 23, 2023, is vacated. Because this is a motion to dismiss, the only documents properly considered are the complaint, originally filed in state court, a copy of which is attached as exhibit 1 to the Notice of Removal (Dkt. No. 1), the moving papers (Dkt. Nos. 2 and 3), the opposition Migues timely filed on January 5, 2023 (Dkt. No. 13), and defendant’s reply brief (Dkt. No. 15). In light of Migues’ status as a pro se litigant, however, his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.