Hernandez

Hernandez v. Syncrasy

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20233:21-cv-09212California1,857 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GERARDO HERNANDEZ, Case No. 21-cv-09212-CRB (LJC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

v. FRANKLIN ST. RC APARTMENTS

LLC’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE

SYNCRASY, et al., ORDER AND EXTENSION OF TIME Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

12 Before the Court is Defendant Franklin St. RC Apartments LLC’s (Franklin) Motion for a Protective Order and for Limited Extension to Respond to Discovery. Dkt. 50. Plaintiff Gerardo Hernandez opposed the motion, Dkt. 53, and Defendant Syncrasy dba Togo’s/Baskin Robbins (Syncrasy) filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion, Dkt. 54. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having read the parties’ submission and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court GRANTS Franklin’s motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action against Defendants Franklin and Syncrasy, alleging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.