Santos
Santos v. County of Humboldt
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 STEVEN A. SANTOS, Case No. 22-cv-07485-RMI
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS
v. Re: Dkt. No. 12 COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, Defendant.
13 Now pending before the court is Defendant’s Motion (dkt. 12) seeking dismissal of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Plaintiff has responded (dkt. 17) and Defendant has replied (dkt. 18); the Motion is therefore ripe for decision. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s motion is granted, but Plaintiff shall have one more opportunity to file an amended pleading if he so wishes. LEGAL STANDARDS The currently-pending motion to dismiss (dkt. 12), filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), challenges the sufficiency of the allegations set forth in the FAC. In reviewing the sufficiency of…