Day

Bradford v. Day

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20234:21-cv-02133California541 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, Case No. 21-cv-02133-PJH

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

R. DAY, Re: Dkt. No. 15 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was dismissed on April 25, 2022, after plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis was denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) which provides that a prisoner may not bring a civil action in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury”. Plaintiff was also provided an opportunity to pay the full filing fee, but no fee was submitted.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.