Rangel

Rangel v. Williams

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20233:21-cv-00278California546 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JONATHAN RANGEL, Case No. 21-cv-00278-JSC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION; SETTING

v. DEADLINES FOR BRIEFING ON

MOTIONS TO COMPEL AND

V. WILLIAMS, et al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

12 Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding without an attorney, has filed a motion for 13 reconsideration of the order denying his motion to strike his deposition in order to prevent a 14 “manifest injustice.” (ECF Nos. 72, 74.) 15 Where the court's ruling has not resulted in a final judgment or order, reconsideration of 16 the ruling may be sought under Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which 17 provides that any order which does not terminate the action is subject to revision at any time 18 before the entry of judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). “Reconsideration is appropriate if the 19 district court (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the 20…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.