Rangel
Rangel v. Williams
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JONATHAN RANGEL, Case No. 21-cv-00278-JSC
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION; SETTING
v. DEADLINES FOR BRIEFING ON
MOTIONS TO COMPEL AND
V. WILLIAMS, et al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.
12 Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding without an attorney, has filed a motion for 13 reconsideration of the order denying his motion to strike his deposition in order to prevent a 14 “manifest injustice.” (ECF Nos. 72, 74.) 15 Where the court's ruling has not resulted in a final judgment or order, reconsideration of 16 the ruling may be sought under Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which 17 provides that any order which does not terminate the action is subject to revision at any time 18 before the entry of judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). “Reconsideration is appropriate if the 19 district court (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the 20…