Salaiz

Salaiz v. Ehealthinsurance Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20235:22-cv-04835California4,690 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 ERIK SALAIZ, Case No. 22-cv-04835-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE

CLASS ALLEGATIONS WITH LEAVE

EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES, INC., TO AMEND AND DENYING MOTION

TO STAY DISCOVERY

Defendant. [Re: ECF Nos. 15, 16, 17] 12 This is a putative class action brought by Plaintiff Erik Salaiz against Defendants eHealthInsurance Services, Inc. (“eHealth” or “Defendant”) and John Doe for allegedly making unlawful calls in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227(b), and California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200. Now before the Court are three motions: (1) Defendant’s motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), see ECF Nos. 15 (“MTD”), 23 (“MTD Reply”); (2) Defendant’s motion to strike class allegations, see ECF Nos. 16 (“MTS”), 25 (“MTS Reply”); and (3) Defendant’s motion to stay …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.