Chung

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Chung

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20234:19-cv-07562California8,599 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-07562-PJH Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

WILSON CHUNG, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 251, 261 Defendants.

13 The parties’ motions for summary judgment came on for hearing before this court on February 2, 2023. Plaintiffs Cisco Systems, Inc. and Cisco Technology, Inc. (collectively, “Cisco”) were represented by Justin Wilcox, Carson Olsheski, Sumeet Dang, and Julianne Thomsen. Defendant Plantronics, Inc. (dba “Poly”) was represented by Jon Dean, Russell Hayman, Tala Jayadevan, and Michelle Lowery. Defendant Wilson Chung was represented by Daniel Muller. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. BACKGROUND This is a trade secrets case. Plaintiff Cisco is a California corporation that designs,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.