Gee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 IRVIN VAN BUREN, Case No. 22-cv-01563-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. ALTER, AMEND, OR SET ASIDE

JUDGMENT

S. GEE, et al., [Re: ECF No. 58] Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Irvin Van Buren filed a lawsuit, arguing that his term of imprisonment violated his constitutional rights. The Court previously dismissed the Second Amendment Complaint without leave to amend. ECF No. 55. Plaintiff then filed a motion, which the Court construed as a motion to alter or amend Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59 or to set aside Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. ECF No. 60. Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend Judgment or to set aside Judgment. ECF No. 58 (“Mot.”); see also ECF No. 62 (“Reply”). Defendants oppose the motion. ECF No. 61 (“Opp.”). The Court determines that the motion is suitable for submission without oral…