Craven

Craven v. Robertson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20233:20-cv-01933California4,243 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

24 The following background is taken from the Court’s February 23, 2022 Order lifting the 25 stay: 26 The original petition provides the following information: After a jury trial in 27 Alameda County Superior Court, petitioner was found guilty of four counts of Petitioner appealed. The California Court of Appeal affirmed the conviction in 2018, and the California Supreme Court denied his petition for review on January 29, 2020. He also filed multiple state habeas petitions in the Alameda County Superior Court that were denied in 2020. He then filed the instant federal habeas action on March 19, 2020. His original petition has a proof of service stating that he mailed it to the Court on March 11, 2020. The petition was stamped “filed” on March 19, 2020. As a pro se petitioner, petitioner receives the benefit of the prisoner mailbox rule, which deems most documents filed when the prisoner gives them to prison officials to mail to a court. See Stillman v. LaMarque, 319 F.3d 1199, 1201 (9th Cir. 2003). The original petition is deemed filed as of March 11, 2020. Petitioner alleged three claims: (1)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.