Narang
Narang v. Narang
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KAMAL NARANG, Case No. 23-cv-00307-DMR
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:
v. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
AMARJIT NARANG, et al., Defendants.
Pro se Plaintiff Kamal Narang filed a complaint and an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on January 20, 2023. [Docket Nos. 1, 2.] Having considered Plaintiff’s papers, the court grants the IFP application. Because the court likely does not have subject matter jurisdiction over this action, Plaintiff is ordered to file a document explaining why subject matter jurisdiction exists. Plaintiff brings claims against ten individuals: Amarjit Narang, John F. Stanley, Mary Elizabeth Grant, Maize Kelsey, Swapna Anthoor, Maria Uhl, Sunaina Sabharwal, Dr. Bhupinder Bhandari, Dr. Pardeep Kumar, and Dr. Gautam Preek. Compl. at 2. As best as the court can tell, 19 Plaintiff alleges that a family court matter filed in the Superior Court of California, County of 20 Alameda…