Huemer

Huemer v. Santa Cruz County Animal Shelter Foundation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20235:21-cv-07372California538 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 ARIANA HUEMER, et al., Case No. 21-cv-07372-SVK

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

v. FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD

AMENDED COMPLAINT

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 50 10 Defendants. 11 Before the Court is the motion of Plaintiffs Ariana Huemer and Eeyore’s Hen Harbor for leave to file a Third Amended Complaint. Dkt. 50. The Court finds this matter suitable for determination without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs seek to amend the complaint because they have obtained the identities of three veterinarians who were originally named as Doe defendants, all of whom Plaintiffs allege to be “contracted veterinarian employee[s]” of Defendant Santa Cruz Animal Shelter. Id.; see also Dkt. 50-1 ¶¶ 10-12. The existing Defendants have responded to the motion for leave to amend by stating that they oppose…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.