Stebbins

Stebbins v. Polano

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20234:21-cv-04184California3,031 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID A. STEBBINS, Case No. 21-cv-04184-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION AND RECUSAL

AND DENYING MOTION FOR

KARL POLANO, et al., RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 159, 162, 165

12 Now before the Court for consideration are the motion for reconsideration and recusal and motion for relief from judgment filed by Plaintiff David Stebbins (“Plaintiff”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and it finds the motion suitable for disposition without oral argument. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motions. BACKGROUND On July 11, 2022, this Court issued an order denying Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment and dismissing the action. That same day, before the Court entered judgment, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting leave to file a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.