Stebbins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID A. STEBBINS, Case No. 22-cv-00546-JSW Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING, IN PART,

v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION,

VACATING JUDGMENT, AND

EMILY REBOLO, et al., REQUIRING AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 21, 23 11 12 Now before the Court for consideration are the motion for reconsideration and recusal and motion for relief from judgment filed by Plaintiff David Stebbins (“Plaintiff”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and it finds the motion suitable for disposition without oral argument. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion, IN PART. ANALYSIS Plaintiff has filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order dismissing this case and a motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b)(6). Plaintiff argues reconsideration is warranted and judgment should be set aside…