Eidler

Eidler v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20234:17-cv-03962California1,089 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STACIA STINER, et al., Case No. 17-cv-03962-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART OMNIBUS

v. MOTION TO SEAL AND

TERMINATING AS MOOT OTHER

BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, INC., et MOTIONS TO SEAL al., Re: Dkt. No. 425, 509, 550 Defendants. 12 On July 11, 2022, the Court ordered the parties to “to meet and confer and file a single administrative motion to seal and proposed order that consolidates all motions to seal that remain pending and that satisfy Civil L.R. 79-5.” Dkt. No. 549. The parties filed an omnibus motion to seal which is now pending before the Court. Dkt. No. 550 (“Omnibus Motion”). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Omnibus Motion. I. LEGAL STANDARD Courts generally apply a “compelling reasons” standard when considering motions to seal documents. Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.